Creation Museum

Now as a Christian I already believe the theory of Creation is how we all came to be. That is to say, I believe in the Bible as the word of God. The WHOLE word of God. Since I believe that, I take it to mean what it says when It tells me that God created the heavens and the earth and everything else to the farthest reaches of space, In SIX days. So I found this trip to be a very refreshing break from the Evolutionary theory that is pushed at me every day by PBS and every other secular media as well as by the schools and “scientists”. “Why”, you might ask, “would you choose to believe in the theory of creation?” Well it is really simple. There are two theories. One is the theory of Creation. The other is the theory of Evolution. So let me take the facts and look at them and apply the real scientific method and see which fits. Fact one. The favorite way to explain the time scale is showing the “bands” of strata that are in the earth and saying this level is from such and such a time etc… BUT what is going on in those bands? There are tree trunks in the bands that run up and down through those bands. How could they exist if this was something that happened over a long period of time? Fact two, the method for dating is radio carbon dating which has been proven to be accurate only back about five to ten thousand years. Fact three, the “science of evolution” requires either sudden drastic mutations which had to be (a) viable for life and (b) widespread. Or it requires that things slowly changed and evolved over a long period of time which means there has to be hundreds or even thousands of intermediate fossils. To date scientists have only found four “examples” of intermediate forms. Three of those were PROVEN false and the fourth (Lucy aka Australopithicene Afarensis.) is a partial skeleton that was found scattered over two miles of riverbed and is so small a sampling that it could be just about anything you wanted it to be with enough imagination. Meantime there are hundreds of critters and examples out there of species’ who could Never exist if Evolution were the reason for life. Some examples are the Red crested Woodpecker. (that’s right Woody the woodpecker would NOT exist if it were up to evolution.) There is also Bombardier Beetles, Bumble bees, Platypuses/i, even our eyeballs have little reason to exist in the evolutionary system. But in Creation? Not only can these things exist but also anything that you could think of might be out there. With creation the only limit is the creator’s imagination. Time after time the Bible has been challenged as an accurate historical document. Time after time it has proven itself to be correct. While time after time there are still points that elude evolution and it has yet to really prove itself at all, no matter what the proponents of it might say. To me that means I can trust the veracity of the Bible a lot more than a bunch of guys who have gone to so much work to fool me. Yes I said they tried to fool me, you too for that matter. They tell us that they have all the answers, but if you ask them about how the Bombardier beetle came to be they splutter and hem and haw until they can change the direction of the conversation. And the same is true for MOST of the points that I mentioned and more. Don’t believe me? Ask them why there are still oceans! Why haven’t they all become salt flats yet since at the rate they are gaining salt they would be solid blocks of the stuff by now (if their time estimates are real). Ask them why the Moon is still in orbit around the earth. Measurements show that the moon is moving away from the earth. If everything was formed even just millions of years ago, instead of the billions they claim, then the moon would no longer be in our orbit. Ask them to explain the woodpecker or the platypus or where they found petrified dinosaur foot prints and human foot prints overlapping one another or … well you get the idea. A word of warning, they will try to deny these things and they will hide it and obfuscate. They will even threaten, cajole and yell at you. But the truth is out there If you will really research this stuff you too will see this. But too long now have the people of our society been told that the ONLY viable choice is evolution because “we cannot believe in Creation because that would imply a God and that would be against separation of church and state.” Or “we have to accept Evolution because to believe in a creator is to take the easy way out.” Because don’t you know “religion is the opiate of the masses.” They feel they have to throw out the creation theory solely because it follows a religious view point and that is totally unacceptable for some reason. My point is, there is more evidence to support creation then there is to support evolution. “Scientists” throw out creation because they cannot have any explanation that presupposes a force, person or deity that might have caused things to be. So the only option they have left is to place their faith, yes I said it F-A-I-T-H!, on a model that cannot be proven. (and so often is disproved.) Think about it.

an OT or a NT problem?

I keep hearing people misrepresenting the bible. That is to say they will take it out of context and they will use only the parts that suit their needs. For example, the other day I got into a discussion with a family member. Not a close one but still family. She claims to be Christian. I do not really know where her faith really lies but her actions and beliefs run counter to what the bible teaches in MANY areas. The Bible tells us that we should protect and help people who are weaker and less capable, people like children or widows. It also indicates that we are a life from the moment of conception. (You knew me when I was in my mother’s womb… Job) That means that abortion should be a big Christian no no. But she supports abortion. The bible tells us in the new and old testaments both that sexual immorality must be avoided (any union between anyone other than a marital relationship between one man and one woman being the standard.) But she supports (or has no problem with) teenage sex, Gay sex, Gay marriage, Divorce, premarital sex, and for all I can tell extra marital sex and promiscuity of all other types. In our argument she basically seemed to be trying to say that all things are allowable… but, I fear her reasoning was faulty. Her viewpoint was that we do not punish people like it says in the Old Testament anymore so those laws do not hold us anymore. So I tried to explain to her the problem with that view. But she cut me, and the conversation, off. I suspect she did that about when I started making sense to her. She could not be reasoned with because she holds her viewpoint and nothing must interfere with it. So here is my point. The Old Testament contains all of the rules by which God expects us to live. (Deut 5) If we fail to follow his laws we are sinners. But no one was, or is, able to follow all of those. Indeed the book of Romans says, in Chapter 3 verse 23 “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” The bible tells us that God is the same forever. He is unchanging, always the same. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Revelation 1:8 “‘I am the alpha and the Omega’, says the Lord God, ‘who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.’” The real issue here is do we still have to follow the old rules? The answer is not a simple yes or no… the thing is that Jesus said he came not to replace the law and the prophets but to fulfil them. That is the law still applies BUT the penalty has been paid. SO we need to try to be good followers of God and that means being obedient. Then the law becomes, not so much a law as a guide for how to live it lets us know how bad we are so we know how much we need his saving grace. Romans 3:20 “Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin. 21 But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the law and the prophets testify. 22 This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile. But no one can follow all of the laws in part because of our sin nature. So the price of sin (Death) is paid. But it is more than that. As a Christian I know and accept that there are going to be people who do not want to follow my God. And that is fine. I will not hurt them or threaten them or anything. I do know they live in sin, and I will warn them against their sin. But that is as far as I go. If they choose to go without accepting my Savior that is their option. It is part of the free will that we all have. BUT if you claim to be a Christian then you ought to be following some certain guidelines. Romans 1: 19 – 20, “since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities- his eternal power and divine nature- have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Obvious huh? God has made it plain for all of us to know and we have no excuse (that goes for both saved and sinner I think) BUT… Romans 1:21-27 “For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God or gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.” But HERE is the real kicker to this… “Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator – who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.” Hmm there it is! The best argument I can think of for how God feels about sexual Immorality IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. Not the Old Testament. So why is this a real problem? Well the thing is we have to accept Jesus as our Lord and Savior or eventually the penalty of our sins WILL come to us, Romans 2:5 “But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew And then for the Gentile; but glory honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew and then for the Gentile.” And again Romans 3:23 FOR ALL HAVE SINNED AND FALL SHORT OF THE GLORY OF GOD, 24 and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. 25 God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood – to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished –“ You see? The penalty of our sins are withheld for a time… but why ought this to be? What does Romans 3 say next? 26 “he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.” God loves us and we can either accept it or reject it. God already made his position plain. Romans 5:8 “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” The question is, now that you know all this what do you intend to do with it? If you claim to be a Christian and support the idea that Homosexuality is something to be encouraged then you need to get before God and have a serious talk. Read your Bible and KNOW the truth. If you are not a Christian but you want to feel God’s acceptance then become a Christian. If you want nothing to do with Christians, God or Christ then simply ignore us all and keep going the way you are. But if you are going to try debating Christians about their faith then you need to stop taking the bible out of context and you need to read up on what you are going to debate. Finally, if you are a totally for Christ 100 % HooRah Christian, you need to read God’s Word, learn it, memorize it and then, when people try to mislead you, you can point to the scripture and verse and say Nope this is what God REALLY has to say about it.

How does Christianity fit Homosexuality?

Recently there has been a lot of discussion about businesses who support gay marriage and businesses that don't. A lot of people say that Christians are hateful because of their view points. I see the Homosexual community insisting that everyone else HAS to be tolerant of them and if you do not accept them or their views, if you do not pander to them, then you have to be a bigoted hateful jerk. But I would disagree. What does the Bible say? God is the same forever and ever. He loves his people but he hates sin and Any sex that exists out of the realms of marriage, one man and one woman, is sinful. David suffered for sexual sin and he was "a man after god's own heart". Samson suffered for his sexual escapades. And Sodom and Gomorrah also paid the price for their sinfulness in sex. Here is an interesting point... ALL of those examples are in the old testament. So does that mean that it all changed when Jesus came around? No. Sin still is punished and these acts are still sinful. BUT Jesus pays the price for our sin nature. he paid the price for me and you and everyone else who accepts him as Lord and Savior. But Christians ought to be trying to tell others about Christ and the gospel. The interesting dilemma is that many people will scream out that what I just said here is hate speech. I ask you what about this is hateful? Think about it. I just said that "Jesus paid the price for our sins if we accept him as Lord and savior". How is that hateful? "you do not have to hurt because the hurt that was due has been done already." I said that sin leads to pain. Is that hateful? I think not it seems to me to be just basic truth. Akin to saying if you whack yourself in the forehead with a 2x4 it will hurt. The reason why they want to say it is hate speech is simple. It is because I am basically saying, if you want to feel better about yourself if you want to have hope, if you want to feel the love of God, YOU HAVE TO CHANGE. And these people do not like that idea. "what makes you better than me?" they yell "how dare you judge me!" they scream. But that is just it. I am not better and I am not the judge, Jesus/God is. If you want to ask what validity my faith has, well that is a separate subject and I will be happy to talk with you about that later.

Who did Jesus come for?

This is a blog that I want to post regarding Christmas. Hope you enjoy. In the story of the Events around Christmas we hear about angels, kings, wise men, shepherds and so on. But the central characters are three people. A girl maybe as old as 16, with no money or status. A carpenter, a young man, also with very little to his earthly ”value”. And the baby Jesus. Who is born in a stable and sleeps in a feed trough. All of these are poor people. (Financially speaking) And Let’s think about who this baby was sent to reach. Who, for example were the first people who were told about the savior? Shepherds! The poorest of the poor, the despised, the downtrodden. And Where were they? At work, even though it is the middle of the night. And what gifts did they bring? The bible does not tell us of a single thing they brought! Just that they came to see the baby. Two years later the rich wise men show up with expensive gifts. Here’s the thing… what is more important? I have to admit, one of my favorite Christmas songs is “the little drummer boy”. A great song all about a kid who comes to see the baby Jesus, he is told to bring a gift fit for a king. But when he gets there all he has is his music. So he gets permission from Mary (“may I play for you … on my drum? Mary Nodded… the ox and lamb kept time… I played my drum for him… I played my best for him… then he smiled at me, me and my drum.”) Jesus accepts the little gifts especially when the heart that gives them is doing the giving rightly. Similarly… One of my favorite stories at Christmas is about the bells in a town church where… Let me tell it to you actually. The story is a special one for Christmas. It is ''Why the Chimes Rang''. It was written by Raymond MacDonald Alden. In a faraway country where few people have ever traveled, there was once a wonderful church. It stood on a high hill in a great city. Every Sunday and on holidays like Christmas, thousands of people climbed the hill to the church. The main room of the church was so long that if you stood at one end, you almost could not see the other end. In the farthest corner was an organ. This organ could play music very loud. Sometimes when the organ is played, people from miles around would close their windows and prepare for a thunderstorm. No such church as this was ever seen before. It was especially wonderful when it was lighted with burning candles for a holiday and filled with young and old people. But the most wonderful and most unusual thing about the huge church was the sound of its bells. Connected to the church was a huge stone tower. Everyone who built the church had been dead for hundreds of years. No one could remember how high the tower reached. It rose so far into the sky that no one could see the top, except when the weather was very clear. Even then a person could not be sure that the top was in sight. All the people knew that at the top of the tower was a group of bells, Christmas bells. They had hung there ever since the church had been built. Their sound was very special. Some thought their sound was so special, because a great musician had made them and put them in place; others said it was because of their great height. They said the air was so clear and pure high up where the bells rang. Everyone who had heard the bells said their sound was the sweetest in the world. Some said they sounded like the singing of God's angles; others said they sounded like wind singing through the trees. But the sad fact was that no one had heard them for years and years. There was an old man living not far from the church who said that his mother had told him of hearing the bells when she was a little girl. But he was the only one who knew even that much. The bells were Christmas bells. They were not meant to be played by the organist, nor were they meant to be heard on common days. It was the custom on the night before Christmas, Christmas Eve, for all the people to bring their gifts to the Baby Jesus to the church. When the greatest and best gift was given, the music of the Christmas bells would be heard. It came from far up in the tower. Some said the wind rang the bells, others said God's angels set the bells moving. But for many long years, the bells did not ring. Some said that people were less careful of their gifts for the Baby Jesus, others said that no gift was great enough to earn the music of the bells. Every Christmas Eve, rich people tried to give better gifts than anyone else, yet the rich people did not give anything they wanted for themselves. Each year there were many gifts, each year the religious service was good, but the bells in the stone tower did not ring. Far away from the city in a country village lived a boy named Pedro and his younger brother. They knew very little about the Christmas bells, but they had heard about the religious service in the church on Christmas Eve. They made a secret plan that they often discussed--they would travel to see the beautiful service. Pedro would say, "Nobody can guess, Little Brother, all the good things there are to hear and see. I have even heard it said the Baby Jesus comes to bless the service. Would if not be wonderful if we could see him?” The day before Christmas was very cold, there was snow in the air, the ground was hard and white with ice. Pedro and Little Brother slipped quietly away in the early afternoon. Walking was very hard in the icy air. But before night they had walked far enough to see light from the big city ahead of them. They were about to enter the city when they saw something dark in the snow near their path. They stepped aside to look at it. It was a poor woman who had fallen just outside the city. She was too sick and too tired to keep going. The soft snow made a kind of bed for her. Soon she would be so sound asleep that no one would ever wake her again. Pedro knelt beside her and tried to wake her. He pulled her arm a little as though he would try to carry her. He turned her face toward him so that he could rub the snow on it. Then he looked at her silently. "It is no use, Little Brother, " he said. "You will have to go on alone. " "Alone? " said Little Brother. "And you will not see the Christmas service? " "No", said Pedro. He could not hold back a sad sound in his throat. "See this poor woman. Her face looks like the face of the mother of Jesus in the church window. She will freeze to death if nobody cares for her. Everyone has gone to church. But when you come back you can bring someone to help her. I will rub her to keep her from freezing and maybe I can get her to eat the bread that is in my pocket. " "I cannot leave you and go on alone. " said Little Brother. "Both of us need not miss the service." said Pedro. "You can find your way to the church. You must see and hear everything twice, Little Brother. Once for you and once for me. I am sure the Baby Jesus must know how I should love to come with you and pray to him and if you get a chance, Little Brother, give the Baby Jesus this small silver coin I brought. Give it when no one is looking and do not get in anyone's way. Remember where you left me. " In this way, Pedro hurried Little Brother to the city. He closed his eyes to keep back tears as he heard his brother's footsteps moving further and further away. It was so hard to miss the music and the beauty of the Christmas service. Instead, he was here in the cold and snow. The great church was beautiful that night. Everyone said it had never looked so bright and beautiful. When the organ played and the thousands of people sang, the walls shook with the sound. Young Pedro, outside the city wall, felt the earth shake around him. At the end of the service came the moment to bring gifts to the Baby Jesus. Rich men, important men gave their gifts. Some brought jewels. A great writer gave a book he had been writing for years and years. Last of all, came the king of the country. He was hoping as everyone hoped to win for himself the music of the bells. People in the seats spoke quietly to each other as they saw the king take his jeweled crown from his head and offered it as his gift. "Surely," everyone said, "we shall hear the bells now. Nothing like this has ever happened before." But all they heard was the cold wind in the tower. The people shook their heads. Some of them said as they had said before that they never really believed to the story of the bells. They said they did not believe the bells ever rang at all. The giving of gifts was over and the singers began the closing song. Suddenly the man playing the organ stopped playing as if he had been shocked. Everyone looked at the old priest. He was standing at the front of the church holding up his hand for silence. Not a sound could be heard from anyone in the church. But as all the people listened, there came softly but clearly through the air, the sound of the bells in the tower. The music was so far away and yet so clear. It was much sweeter than anything that had ever been heard before. The music seemed to rise and fall in the sky. People in the church sat still as though something held their shoulders. Then they stood up together. They looked at the front of the church to see what great gift had caused the bells to ring. All that those in front saw was a child. Little Brother had moved silently to the front of church when no one was looking. He had given the Baby Jesus Pedro's small piece of silver. The point here is that the gift isn’t the important thing it is the heart of the giver. But how often do we get wrapped up in the minutiae of things. How often do we focus on giving the bigger or better gift. How often do we focus on what gift we are getting? I have seen too many times in my life people get hurt because the gift they gave wasn’t “good” enough. Or “expensive” enough or whatever. How many times have we hurt others by looking down at the gift they offer and tsk tsk at them? When Faith was a little girl about to celebrate her first birthday. A friend of ours decided to make a gift for her. He took an empty oatmeal canister. Cut out the bottom of it and wrapped the remaining tube in aluminum foil. For months that was the only toy that Faith wanted to play with. She loved it. How many of us have ruined Christmas for others by trying to outdo one another in the gifts given? I think this is something we ought to think on year round. Maybe we ought to focus on the good points and try to lift people up instead of bring them down. Maybe the next time you see someone struggling to make ends meet while holding down a “menial” job, instead of pointing out how they ought to find a “better” (in your opinion) job. Maybe you should instead congratulate them on the fact that they HAVE a job and that they are trying to provide for their family instead of choosing to live on other taxpayer’s money. For that matter when you see someone who is out of work, especially in this economy, try helping them out a little. Don’t sit there and point out how you are so much richer or better off than they are. In fact let me help you out a little. If you feel like saying something like… “What a cheapskate.” “How lazy s/he is.” “Why do these lazy so and so’s keep stealing my tax dollars?” Then you would be in the wrong! What you ought to say (and think) instead is “wow that poor family is having some trouble making it… maybe I ought to see if there is something I can do to help”. Maybe the people you are looking down on would love to improve their position. But they cannot afford to go to school, or there are no jobs locally that they qualify for. Maybe you can be someone who steps up and says “what can I do to help?” Don’t come storming in saying things like “oh hey here is a great job in another state. Here is a way that you can make an extra buck.” How do you know? How do you know what they might need or want if you haven’t either asked them or been in their shoes? Do you think it is appropriate to offer a job as a stockbroker to a guy who is clueless about what stocks are? Do you think he ought to be an accountant… why? Did you know that he is incapable of doing math? Maybe he has a math learning disability. Some people do you know. Or you think she ought to be a librarian… after all she is good with books and loves to read. Just because she loves to read does not mean the library is a suitable place for her. Also, too many people judge others, because those others don’t have the same motivations in life. My wife once encountered that. She was a high schooler at the time, and she was talking with someone who asked, “so what do you want to go to college to learn?” her response was almost automatic. “I want to study to become a teacher.” This was her dream, her lifelong goal! She KNEW what she wanted and had since she was a little girl. So her response was an automatic one. But the response she got in return was… well… “oh you won’t be able to make much money doing that.” How hurtful! To have her lifelong dream simply dismissed just because it did not measure up to someone else’s ideal. (making money) As I told Christina, “the response you got, that is the response of someone who knows the cost of everything, but the value of nothing.” Think about oh Michael Jackson or Brittany Spears… does it seem to you that their lives are/were all light and roses? Did Michael Jackson really feel happiness? Is that why he went through all the plastic surgery? How about Kurt Cobain, who killed himself. Is that the act of a happy man? But hey he was RICH Loaded. Or as I once heard a comedian put it… loooooaaaaaadddeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do you think, looking at Brittany Spears’ life, that she is truly happy? How about Lindsay Lohan? How about the long run? What good do you think all that money is doing for people like Christopher Reeves, Farah Fawcett, Elvis Presley, James Dean, Marilyn Monroe, James Doohan, J.D. Rockefeller… all of these people were well off or “wealthy” by earth’s standards. How many of them took their money with them? N O N E!!!!!!! were they happy? What difference did Helen Keller’s teacher make? We may not always remember her name (Anne Sullivan) but she inspires us still today. How about Mother Theresa, Ghandi, Saint Nicholas, Emperor Constantine, the apostle Paul… Still today they all continue to make a huge difference… and yet none of those listed in the second list sought fame or riches. (Constantine started out rich). Speaking of Helen Keller, she had a great quote… “there is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his.” So how about you? Are you going to do the same thing and hurt people just because they don’t want to go to the places you want to go to? Do you want to bring the big expensive gift that cost a lot but means nothing? Or would you rather be the kind of person that realizes the value of things that sometimes may not have much earthly worth? These are standards that mean a lot to some people. Maybe next New Year, you ought to make the resolution that you will seek out ways to help out. Start a scholarship so that working stiffs can still get an education. Or find one you can contribute to. Volunteer some time to help other people know about the options out there. Not in a “hey you ought to.” Way but in a “hey what do you want, and how can I help?” way. If you can do that people will love to have you around. Otherwise you are more likely to cause hurt and pain instead of helping out. Or even better don't wait, start it now. never too soon to do good things.

Christmas in July?

I am kind of curious, How many of you out there start getting a little itch for Christmas halfway there? Be honest now. I sometimes start to feel like I would like to celebrate Christmas around mid June, I think I am not the only one at least in part based on the fact that so many people talk about or even participate in Christmas in July events. It is interesting when you are going through all that though. Still... We are told that we ought to think and live as if it were Christmas every day, so I guess that it is a good thing to remember and focus on Christmas now. In honor of that next week's post will also be Christmas oriented. But I would like to encourage you to think on what Christmas means to you. And while you are at it maybe you could go out and do something for someone in the spirit of Christmas. We can serve Christ every day, I just want to encourage you all to do something extra special nice this week. Until next time.

So how are Christians supposed to act?

I have to tell you that I am very worried about the way that people behave in the here and now while calling themselves Christians. For those of you who are not Christian I would ask you that you would give those who are the benefit of the doubt. Just like many of you are trying to do with Muslims or Buddhists or Hindus or… See just like it was a small subset of Muslims who attacked and destroyed so much on September 11 it is a small but obvious group of people who call themselves Christian who give the rest a black eye. Many of these people have no clue what it really says in the bible. They never read theirs though they may have 5 or 6 in their homes. Some of us try to read our bibles but get easily distracted. And some of us manage to get into the word of God regularly. It does not help when people who are NOT Christian try to tell everyone what is in the bible when all too often it is taken out of context. How would you like it if I told you all about your favorite idea/s but never really learned what those ideas really were? So give the Christians you know a bit of a break. They are not perfect they are people too just like you, they make mistakes just like you. And while some of them might seem to be a little quick to hold things over others, haven’t you done the same thing once or twice? As it says in Roman’s “all have sinned and fallen shirt of the glory of God.” Even those who are Christians.

Why is the Lord of the rings and the Chronicles of Narnia OK for Christians to read but Harry Potter isn’t?

Well on the surface this seems both easy and hard, and it is, just not in the way it looks. I once helped to teach a Sunday school class for third graders. That question came out right after the LOTR trilogy was released (which also happened to be when A Narnia movie came out as well as a Harry Potter. And it raised some real questions for “our” kids. A friend of mine tried saying that it was because Gandalf and the characters in lord of the rings were true to their form. In other words Gandalf was MADE to be a wizard as Legolas was MADE to be an elf and Frodo was made to be a hobbit. But the thing is that really the same could be said of Harry Potter. The ones who were wizards were ones who were BORN to it. You do not ever see in those books Uncle Vernon trying to pick up a wand and wave it to make magic. Aunt Petunia never puts a cauldron in the kitchen and start adding eye of newt or toe of frog. And Dudley never tries to fight dementors… EVEN WHEN THEY ARE ATTACKING HIM. Harry, ( and Hermione and Draco and Ron etc…) were BORN Or created the way they were, the same as Gandalf and others. So that doesn’t hold up. It isn’t about magic per se. obviously look at the comparison. It isn’t about the monsters. There are trolls, goblins, Wargs and other nasties in LOTR the same as in Potter. And there are even more of those kinds of things in Narnia then there are in HP. So where is the problem? Could it be that it is simply because J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis use initials instead of a full name? Oh wait J.K. Rowling… nope guess that wasn’t it. Maybe it is because Lewis and Tolkien wrote from a Christian Perspective and Rowling did not. Ah yes… and no. Tolkien’s books were not meant to take the place of any thing Christian, neither were they supposed to be allegorical (though Lewis’ works clearly were.) Tolkien was simply writing about good verses evil period. Some would say here that that is the same thing Rowling does. Of course Rowling's characters were children placed in harm’s way while Tolkien went to great pains to point out that his Characters were all grown up. “AH” you say “but Lewis’ characters were children too!” But here we come to the real crux of the problem. See the real difference (and it is really a simple one). Tolkien's good guys never lied. Lewis’ good guys didn’t lie either at least not after they were redeemed. See the real problem with Harry Potter is one of simple morality. Whatever Harry chooses to do is OK either simply because it’s Harry, or because everything worked out ok in the end. Harry, Ron and Hermione accuse, lie, cheat, disobey, steal and basically sin their way through it all and in the end it’s ok because the ends justify the means. Yeah they put themselves and others in danger when they disobeyed and went up against the troll but they beat it so it’s ok. Yeah Harry cheated and snuck out to go to town when He shouldn’t have but he is ok so no harm done give him a treat. Yeah they flaunted authority but the authority was in the wrong and so it is ok that they did that. They get to make (or break) the rules as they go. However they want to do it. They never are brought to justice. They just “follow their heart/s” and it is all ok. No need for adult supervision, they all just get in the way or make things difficult. No need for obedience to the law never mind that those laws are there to protect them. CLEARLY they must know better then whoever made up that law. After all they ARE ok aren’t they? See in Narnia we see what harm can come from telling a lie. In HP telling a lie can be a good thing. In Narnia we see that we need to find forgiveness when we hurt others. In HP however not only do we not have to try to get along but we can be rude and spiteful at the same time. In Middle earth we see a huge struggle between good and evil. In hp we see a struggle between evil and… the not so bad maybe after all when you realize how well it all worked out in the end right? Now maybe HP seems more like the way the world works in reality where we have to compromise (not that Harry is ever willing to compromise where Snape is concerned) and things aren’t always picture perfect. But Christians are supposed to think on “whatever is GOOD whatever is HOLY” and that AIN’T Harry Potter. Sometimes we need to be aware of what message we are sending to our kids. And while sometimes the world requires compromise, we, ALL OF US, should be trying to pursue loftier realms. Watch a movie Like Seabiscuit, Rudy, The Rookie. The Sound of Music (all based on real life events) or Chariots of fire (again…). Here are people REAL LIFE PEOPLE who did not compromise their faith or beliefs and the world was made a better place for it.

Why do Christians debate people?

The real crux of the debate as I see it is as follows. There are Christians/people of faith in the world and there are people who are against that faith. Now people who believe in God (Christians) are trying to live their lives the way that God tells them (us) to. That means reaching out to others, preaching the word and praying. In the Bible we see that God is not willing that any one should die (that is to die in sin without knowing God) but he has given us free will so there will be those who will. The other side is represented by people who will declare, as loudly as they can, that They want to be “Happy” they want to be allowed to live “THEIR” life/lives the way THEY see fit. As soon as you make that declaration you show that you are living only for yourself, that is selfish plain and simple. You are living your life for you and only you. God tells us to live for others and for him. Now the Christian view is that there will be an afterlife, a shot at living for ETERNITY in heaven. The way to get there is through Jesus Christ. That means there is hope. This world is NOT all we have there is a time when I will be able to live a life that is perfect. Where there is no pain there is no worry and I can be with all those I have loved and that others have loved and this is something that I can lead other people to. How wonderful it would be for all who I know to be able to know God and to be with him in that love and care for ETERNITY. On the other hand the selfish person is basically saying I want to be happy NOW, I want to be happy HERE. There is no thought at all for any future, let alone eternity. So they are basically living without hope they are living this life basically saying “this is it, this is all I have available to me. How MISERABLE that must be. There can be no hope in that thinking because that means that the only thing we get is what this world offers us and what do we get from this world? We get too hot, we get too cold. We face constant hardship and struggle. We get sick we get injured we see friends and family die sometimes in Horrible ways. That is what this world offers. Entropy suffering sickness pain sorrow and finally death. How sad how miserable how depressing. That is why Christians try to teach people about Jesus, that is why they will tell you about his love that is why they will pray for you and that is why they have hope. They want to share that hope and yet all those others out there want to reject it insisting that this is it.

A different perspective on it all.

I recently was involved in a couple of different debates. Both of these involved people who call themselves Christians. Unfortunately they also both show the problem that people see when they look at “Christians” and why some judgements are passed on us all because of your actions. First my conversation on Facebook. A friend of mine posted an issue regarding the preferential treatment some religions get, in the military, over Christianity. Her point was a valid one that needs to be opened so others can talk about it. But one of her… “less religious” friends took exception to the idea. Her view point was one that unfortunately is prevalent today. “Christianity needs to be more accepting of other religions, after all, all religions are equal.” This is a concept that first has to assume that all religions ARE equal. Any “Christian” should be able to refute, easily. But so often “we” can’t seem to. Why is that? Simply because we, first, do not know what it is that we believe in. Second, we do not live our lives by the standards set by that faith. An excellent example would be my second conversation. I was standing near a pair of men who go to my church. They are active in the church and they were, in fact, there to participate in a ministry opportunity. The conversation involved politics, more specifically it involved the issue of Taxation… Flat tax verses progressive tax. Both the other gentlemen preferred the idea of a flat tax because “those people who are NOT paying taxes are benefiting and living off the fruits of other’s labor. Now here is a sound argument right? I pointed out that many of those who are not paying taxes right now CANNOT afford to pay taxes. They are already stretched to the limit. When I made that point their responses were… (1) They need to budget their money better. And, (2) They could always go out and get a better job or an education so that they could have better pay. And (3) if they were paying taxes the economy would be better and that would solve their problem.” Here is the problem with those arguments… in reverse order. So first, the problem with the last point is that the economy didn’t go south because of people not paying taxes, it went down because banks were playing loosey goosey with the financial market and made bad loans and then the government tried to bail them out. This increased the burden on a desperate, GLOBAL, society and caused panic and devastation for a lot of people in all walks of life. Rich, poor or middle class! Second point, I challenge these gentlemen, or any other Christian, to tell me how it is that someone who cannot afford to pay a 10 percent tax (on their 200 dollar a week pay) might be able to pay 20-50 THOUSAND dollars instead. All so that they can get an education so they can get a better job. I have tried to get an education and I got part way through college before the money dried up. The federal government will not pay a full tuition. So I have to make up the difference. How am I to do that? There are only so many grants and scholarships, they are all being fought for by LOTS of people, and most of those won’t cover even half of the cost that is left after the Government assistance. So in order to cover the whole cost I would have to either get a really AWESOME scholarship, or compete and HOPE that I can get enough of the smaller scholarships in order to cover the cost/s. OR I could try to get a loan right? First leaving aside today’s economy, where it would be difficult to get a job after school, is it really in the best interest of these people to go into debt when they are not sure if they are going to ever be able to get out of it again? After all that happens often enough to be a concern. And that is assuming that they have the credit score to get those loans; that their credit wasn’t already damaged because they had to try to make ends meet and they couldn’t so they defaulted on their car payment or rent. So an education might not be the best viable solution… unless we mandated and paid for (with our tax dollars) free college for everyone. But doesn’t that add to the problem? So finally we get to address that first point. Budget their money better… yeah that is right it is all the fault of these poor people that they are poor right? I wonder how many of you “Christians” have considered that Jesus (you know the reason for Christmas) was born poor? Based on the argument that these poor people need to just budget better then aren’t we in effect saying that it was Mary or Joseph’s fault that Jesus was born in a stable? After all if they had only budgeted their time better they could have arrived early enough to get that room in the inn. Or if they had budgeted their finances better they might have been able to convince the innkeeper to kick out another guest in favor of the higher rate, or even let them stay in his own room while he and or his family made due elsewhere. While that was not a point I made at the time, because there was no time. (And I didn’t think of it until much later) I pointed out to them that I had been there myself, and there are people out there who are on so limited a budget there is no room in that budget for ANY give. I pointed out that at the time I had NO tv NO movies NO Internet NO phone NO car... etc. All I was paying for was rent, utilities, and food. (not even enough give in my budget to buy clothes.) One of the guys in this conversation said, “ and you were probably happier too!” the sheer audacity of that statement floored me. He thought I should be happy that I was holding down three part time minimum wage jobs, trying to pay for college, having to walk up to 10 miles a day, no time to do homework, nothing to distract me from things. No chance to rest or recuperate no entertainment, no special moments in my life. Freezing in the winter because I could not afford good clothes that would keep the cold out. And I ought to be JUMPING for joy over this. I wasn’t and, honestly, looking back I don’t think I should have been. It was a trial that came right at the moment when I had first accepted Christ as my savior, one that was VERY difficult. To be honest had anyone said the things to me then that they were saying the other day I might have felt like just giving it all up, then where would I be today? I would have definitely reconsidered following Christianity if I had had to face such accusatory and hateful attitudes. But that is exactly the issue that some supposed, self proclaimed “Christians”, are doing every day today. My question for you is… Are you doing this? Are you trying to reach out to people? Are you trying to show them the love that Christ did? Or are you going to whine that you have to pay taxes and someone else doesn’t? When Jesus was asked about his attitude on taxes he said “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.” not complain that your burden is greater than another’s. When Jesus addressed how to treat the needy, he never said make them pay their fair share. He said “I was hungry, and you fed me. I was naked and you clothed me, I was thirsty and you gave me drink. In that you did this for the least of these my children you did it also unto me.” Oh and by the way Jesus also never added the caveat that we could only do this when we were sure that the food clothing or money we give isn’t going to be used for alcohol or drugs. Jesus never said give to the poor and needy as long as you know they won’t use it for wine. So If and when the tax code changes to include the impoverished I will expect them to help foot the bill. But the fact of the matter is that we need to focus on being good Christians in attitude and deed and to show Christ’s love, which does not mean complaining! It means reaching out as well as you can to those in need. To that measure I would advise you all to go out right now, find someone out there who is hungry or thirsty or cold. Give them food or a blanket or money pray for them, tell them about the excellent programs your church may offer to help them get on their feet. And leave the rest up to God. By doing these things you will show the world the potential of the love of Christ. By doing it without judgement you will be showing exactly the love Christ showed when he hung on the cross for your sins.

Why I cannot understand The fight.

I am growing a little concerned about the way some “Christians” are thinking.

Namely this is about the Homosexual lifestyle and thoughts.

I hear a lot of people, Christian and other, saying that we need to be accepting of Homosexuals. They say that they cannot help the way they were made. They say that everyone deserves love.

On the surface, I would agree, but first I have to ask, what do you mean by love?

The greeks had several different words for love. The ones we will face here in this article are Phileto and Eros. There is a third that we will get to later.
Anyway Phileto we all actually know; it is one half of the word used for a major city, Philadelphia. The city of Brotherly love. See but that is the thing that is the love that we seem to skew to something else.
To me there is a difference between love and lust! I love my children. I do not want to have sex with them. I love my aunts, my uncles, my siblings, my mother and my father. I Do NOT want to sleep with them.

I think the love people really are usually talking about is Eros. This love is really lust! A desire to sleep with to have sex with the object of that desire.
Here is the thing. When a Homosexual says “I can’t help it that is the way that I am.” Then what he/she is ultimately saying in that case is “I cannot control my sexual urges”.

Well wait a minute, isn’t that then an excuse that anyone can use? A rapist a child molester or a peeping tom? They just cannot control it!

WARNING WARNING VERY MATURE SUBJECT MATTER FOLLOWS!!!
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE EASILY OFFENDED!
I have/had a strong sexual urge. Sometimes I think/have thought that if I could have sex three times a day, 7 days a week, that would not be enough.
When I was a young boy and first discovered masturbation I abused myself so much that within a week my abdomen HURT, because of the tightening of muscles I experienced every time I had an orgasm.
If I had not discovered a vibrator I would have rubbed off all the skin down there!
I could not control it! Or could I? If I would be honest I would have to say, “yes I could have controlled myself, I just didn’t want to because it felt so GOOOOODDDDD!!!!!.

But here is the thing, I CAN control my lust. And if I am going to follow Christ I have to control that.
God tells us that any extra marital sex is sinful.
If I have sex with a girl who is not my wife I am sinning, if I have sex with my girlfriend before we get married I am sinning. And if I choose to have sex with someone who is the same sex as me I am sinning.

I heard people complaining about Kirk Cameron lately because he made “homophobic” statements. The thing is that I think we all need to lay off. Those who want to pick on him for those views would complain about how he is a hypocrite if he lived his life the same as them while judging them but he doesn’t so the masses feel they have to pick on him for the views he has.
He is living his life by the standards he sees as important… so the question becomes, “Why are they so threatened by that?”

I have heard Christian pastors and lay-people claiming that God doesn’t speak out against Homosexuality. But wait what was the whole thing about Sodom and Gomorrah about?

Was it not a condemnation of the homosexual lifestyle? People who say God doesn’t speak against homosexuality will say “no, God was speaking out against Sin in General”, or “it was really about the sin of forcible rape.” Or something. The thing is that doesn’t fit! If it was about sin in general then why did the Lord have his angels save Lot? What about his family? Remember, after being saved Lot’s daughters deliberately got him drunk and slept with him. That is not the behavior of people who never sin!

And as for the forcible rape issue, Lot offered his daughters up as a kind of sacrifice… “ you can have my daughters who have never known any man!” That sounds to me like an acceptance of the idea of rape! Yet they still saved Lot. So the only point left to argue in there is the point that when the townsmen came to Lot’s home they specifically said, “send those men out here that we might have [sex] with them.”

Thus God said in that action, It is sinful to participate in a homosexual lifestyle.

Yeah I could use all the old excuses too. I could point at how David was a “man after God’s own heart.” And yet he was such a sinner that he.
(1) Commited adultery.
(2) Tried to cover up his sin through manipulation
(3) Deliberately Caused the death of the husband of the woman with whom he had sinned.

If David a man after God’s Heart was able to do all that and STILL be a man after God’s own heart then doesn’t it fit that I can do the same without penalty?
The answer, Of Course, is NO. God wants us to follow him and what made David a man after God’s own heart was that he repented of the actions and turned to the right way after the sin was pointed out to him.
Same for me and for anyone else who participates in sinful behavior.

So should we love Homosexuals? Yes.
Does that mean we HAVE to accept their choices as the only option? No.

They are not practicing LOVE as we would know it. This is not Phileto, this is not Agape. This is Eros and that is not love, that is lust, and in that way it is a sinful thing.

All that Christians are saying (or should be saying) is that I cannot just go out and rape whoever I want. I cannot have sex with just anyone because that is a sin. It does not matter what I think I can or cannot control.
So the same standards that I am held to/holding myself to, I am asking them to be held to.

IF you are going to call yourself a Christian, you cannot live for your lusts! You need to repent of your sinfulness and live for God. The word Christian literally means Like Christ. Are you being like Christ? Are you abstaining from sin? Or are you making excuses? Jesus never made excuses he lived a life pure and holy. End of story.

Stop the arrogance

At work I was thinking about something that has come up.
I think you all should know by now that I believe that it is only human arrogance that makes us think God has to tell us everything. It is after all in my last blog.
But the thing is let’s look at what evidence there is to support this. Oddly enough I will start with the opposite view.
God wants us to grow, he wants us to be able to learn. In order to achieve his wish for this to be so he tells us about the cases of others. Adam and Eve is about the creation of earth and the universe, right?
Well what use is there for us in knowing how they were kicked out of the Garden of Eden?

See here is the thing, we need to know the nature of God. By telling us the plane he had for Adam and then for Eve, he is giving us insight into how things were supposed to be. In fact I would go further and say he is giving us insight into where he wants us NOW.
But there was a problem, the serpent! This “individual” comes along and whammo we are screwed as a people.
God allows us to know the details of that. Why? Because we can use those details as an opportunity to learn.
Think about it.

First Eve listened to the serpent instead of following God’s word and she entered into sin. What is the lesson for us? Get into God’s word. If we know his word we will not be easily swayed.
Second We also learn that there are those who will try to draw us away from God. And they will succeed if we let them.
Third. When the Serpent approached Eve she was alone. This shows us that when we are separated from God AND from fellow believers we are easy targets for evil.
What happened next? She told Adam “Hey this stuff is good!” and so Adam eats. What do we learn here?
First we learn that we need to listen to God. Adam had the benefit of talking to God directly but instead of listening to God he chose to listen to his wife instead.
Second we learn that we need to be faithful.
Third we learn that we will be punished when we fail to live up to the rules set.

Again in the story of Cain and Able it is the same thing. We are being taught a value system that God has in place.
See the point is all these things are in there to teach us and to grow us. The fact that something ISN’T in there though does not mean that it is not so.
The Bible does not say anything about the sun being the center of the galaxy, or the Mayans living on the other side of the world or… but these things are true.
Like I said before, we need to read the word of God and understand it. And that means ALL of it. Too many people will be ready to tell you what the Bible says and or doesn’t say.
For example, I know of a radio host who likes to goad Christians by telling them they have to follow the Old Testament laws. He brings up that argument every time a Christian starts worrying about what might happen because of the extremism in other religions.
His point is that the Old Testament supports extremes just as much as any other religious text and that if we do NOT follow the Old Testament laws to the letter then we are hypocrites.
The problem is that the NEW testament brought to us by Jesus Christ, while it does not cancel out the way we OUGHT to live it DOES cancel out the debt penalty that is owed.
As I have said before Jesus pays the penalties for our sins. Paul points out that we are still to live our lives as best we can, however the payment is made for what we do wrong

This is something that he cannot understand. God sent his son to earth. Jesus said he came “to fulfil the law and the prophets”. And therefore the parts in the Old Testament where it demands things like stoning of adulterers WE DO NOT HAVE TO DO. “Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord.” God will deal out the punishment/s.
Some people will tell you this is a difference from the God of the Old Testament but it isn’t. Everything God has done has been an act of love.
He could have/should have allowed Adam and Eve to die instantly for their sin. But he let them live and have offspring. Why? He loved them.
God could have destroyed Cain on the spot but no. why? Love.
God could have destroyed ALL the people in the flood but God loved Noah.
At any point in the history we see God could have killed all of mankind and started over. But love stayed his hand every time.
Again, he could have left his people the Israelites in captivity in Egypt, but instead he set them free because he loved them.
He could have let them stay in the desert but he loved them enough to feed them, give them water, part the red sea and finally lead them to a land that was good for them.

ALL of that for love.

So, to me, there is no doubt that the same God who showed love in all those things would also show love towards us “in that while [we] were yet sinners he sent his son to die for us.” (John 3:16)
We need to read his word and know it then we need to test the people who are telling us about him through his word and know if they are honest or not.
There was once a time when the Bible was written in a language that few people still knew how to read. God gave us men (and women) to faithfully translate his words so that they could be read by all. We need to do that (read his word) so that the efforts of those people do not go to waste.
One of my favorite verses is psalm 119:11… look it up and memorize it.

What about the things the Bible doesn’t talk about?

I would like to preface this with a disclaimer…
I do not have an opinion one way or the other about what might or might not be in this world or out of this world. I am merely trying to point out that we need to understand things before we go jumping to conclusions. As Shakespeare said “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”
Yup that’s right there are things that the Bible leaves undiscussed.

One night at work I heard a man on the radio telling the listeners that “the Bible does not say there are aliens so therefore they cannot exist.”
He was rather adamant that this was the case. And my first thought was “how unbelievably arrogant of him.”
I mean think about it. Who are we as humans to think that we know better than God, and further what is it about us that is so important that God has to kowtow to us and tell us “EVERYTHING”?
God, not man, is the creator of all that we see. God not man, laid out the plans before everything was made and it is God, not man, who still is in control of his creation.
Who are we to say that it must be done OUR way?
How many times do we see the example of how much more God knows over how much we know?
God is omniscient and omnipresent. There is no man on the face of this earth who can make the same claim.
But this man had his ideas and points about why there couldn’t be some things.
So let us consider...

“Just because the Bible doesn’t talk about aliens they don’t exist.”
Well the Bible never mentions the Maya or the Native Americans. It doesn’t even mention that the America’s exist. But here they are. What a surprise that must have been.
The Bible never mentions that the earth is round or spherical (to be more accurate) but we know better. In fact Jesus said go into the Four Corners of the world and spread the gospel. Taken literally this would signify a square or flat earth.
The Bible never tells us that the earth revolves around the sun but we now know this to be true.

In each of these cases someone at sometime stood up and said “well it doesn’t mention it in the Bible so it cannot be.” The church even excommunicated some pioneers in science for these theories.

He also said that in order for us to be saved Jesus had to take on the form of man. (true) and that therefore he could not have taken on the form of an alien (?) which means that aliens cannot be saved so this proves there cannot be any aliens (???.)
First of all we are shown in God’s word that we are created in God’s image. We do not have any idea what physiology aliens might enjoy… they may also look like us, they may also have feelings like us and since we were created in God’s image he might have done the same for any aliens.
Second of all Original sin came through Adam and Eve. Whether there is a penalty or sinful nature to the aliens is beyond our knowledge or understanding, they might not have needed to be “saved” if they did not participate in the sin. This seems very unlikely, consider Romans 3:23, and also because we see that all of animal kind also experiences death, which is the penalty for sin.
Mankind dragged down all the rest of creation with that mistake so it is likely that we dragged down aliens too, If they existed and If they didn’t actually sin themselves (and if they have souls). So it is very likely that the aliens would need salvation too, if it were possible.
Maybe the aliens do not have saving grace and that is why they keep abducting people and scaring the snot out of us is because they blame us for this state of affairs.
Anyway, since death is the penalty of sin maybe saving grace would be needed for them but this brings me to my final point on the subject.

The Aliens might not be saved at all; to make his claim that, "the only option is that they had to accept Christ in order to even exist". Well this isn’t true, they may exist but be destined for hell. Just because they have not accepted Christ does not mean they do not exist. Any man on earth (or woman) who rejects Jesus is going to face hell. That doesn’t mean they all of a sudden cease to exist here and now.

The thing is that it is God who knows it all and it is God who runs it all. We do not get that much say in the whole thing. We need to stop second guessing him and his word and simply live our lives trusting him. Trusting that he knows best. And in that trust when/ if something happens trust that he will see us through it.

There is also the point that it could simply be a case of "none of [our] business". There is a book I like a lot titled a horse and his boy. Written by C.S. Lewis. at one point in the book a character asks Aslan about what happened to someone else. Aslan responds with "that is her story not yours. the point being it was none of her business. and I think the same could be said of any "aliens" that might be out there. Maybe, just maybe the Bible doesn't talk about them because, at least till now, it has been NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

What we need to focus on here and now is where we stand with God. that is our primary concern and that is what we need to focus on.

When you make certain declarations as a faith, and there is nothing in God’s word to actually verify it, then there is the very real chance that you will mislead someone to doubt God and thus drive them away.

And that is something we should not do. How much was the faith of our ancestors tried when some churchman or church stood up and said, “It isn’t in the Bible so it cannot be.” Just to find out that it so very much can be and is.

God doesn’t fit in our boxes, so quit trying to put him there.